The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah by Jacobz de Wet/Wikipedia/Public Domain

According to archaeologists working on the site believed to include the ancient cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, they found evidence confirming the Biblical record that the two cities were destroyed by sulphur and fire:

23 The sun had risen on the earth when Lot came to Zoar. 24 Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the Lord out of heaven. 25 And he overthrew those cities, and all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground.

Genesis 19: 23-25 NASV

The archaeologists, who have been working on the site for 13 years, reported discovering evidence of intense heat. This included clay and rock that had been turned into glass. This would require a brief burst of heat of between 8,000 to 12,000 degree Celsius.

The archaeologists also noted that the destruction took place “in an instant,” and resulted in the stripping of the topsoil. The archaeologists added that “a super-heated brine of Dead Sea anhydride salts pushed over the landscaped by the Event’s frontal shock wave.”

It is interesting that even the Biblical account noted the appearance of salt as it described Lot’s wife being turned into a pillar of salt (Genesis 19:26), and as well, noted the destruction of vegetation (v 25). The archaeologist estimated it would have taken nearly 600 years for the soil to recover.

They wrote, “the physical evidence from Tall el-Hamman and neighboring sites exhibit signs of a highly destructive concussive and thermal event that one might expect from what is described in Genesis 19.”

The research group believes a cosmic event contributed to the destruction of these cities, more specifically, the explosion of an asteroid over the area. They estimated the blast killed between 40,000 to 65,000 people. Carbon dating indicates the explosion took place about 3,700 years ago.

Though, they suggested a natural event was responsible for the destruction, would this eliminate God’s involvement?

No, because God used natural events when He judged the earth with a flood. This included 40 days and nights of rain and releasing the fountains of the deep (Genesis 7:11-12).

And it is important to note, this won’t be the only time that God will use a cosmic event to judge the world. In the Book of Revelation, we read that God will judge the world with a massive mountain-sized asteroid that will cause massive destruction (Revelation 8:8-9).

So why did God judge Sodom and Gomorrah?

When we read the account of Sodom and Gomorrah, a strange thing happened. After God told Abraham about the judgment of the two cities, Abraham negotiated with God asking if the cities would be judged if there were 50 righteous in the city. When God agreed not to judge them if there were 50, Abraham then negotiated the number down 10. If there were 10 righteous, the cities would be spared.

Why did Abraham stop at 10? I believe he stopped because the patriarch felt he had that number covered by Lot and his family who were living in the city.

But when we read a passage in Ezekiel that describes why God judged Sodom and Gomorrah, the prophet said an abomination (singular), one event, changed everything.

49 Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it.

Ezekiel 16: 49-50 ESV

The Prophet Ezekiel listed several reasons for the judgment. Their arrogance, apathy, and lack of concern for the poor and as well as an abominable or detestable thing.

What was that abomination?

When Abraham and the two angels entered the city, the men of Sodom desired to have sex with the two angels (Genesis 19:4-5). They wanted to gang-rape the two male angels.

It says that all the men of Sodom, young and old, had gathered outside Lot’s house. This included the leaders. The city was being run by thugs.

This didn’t happen in a vacuum. I believe others had suffered a similar fate.

But I believe it was this one event that sparked the judgment. If this had not happened, I believe the cities could have avoided judgment.

It is very similar to what happened during the flood, when God judged the world after the sons of God married the daughters of men (Genesis 6:1-2). Most believe the sons of God were angels, and this meant, similar to Sodom, the world was judged because of sexual relations between humans and angels, or in Sodom’s case the desire for it.

And Jude alludes to this in verses 6-7, when he speaks of two incidents that resulted in judgment because of a desire for strange flesh. In the Genesis account, it was the angels that desired strange flesh (human women) and in Sodom’s case, it was men who desired strange flesh (angels).

READ: After 13 years of digging, archaeologists said ‘Cosmic airburst event’ wiped Sodom and Gomorrah off the map ANDThe 3.7kaBP Middle Ghor Event: Catastrophic Termination of a Bronze Age Civilization.” AND Evidence of Sodom? Meteor blast cause of biblical destruction, say scientists

12 responses to “Archaeological evidence confirms that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed by intense fire”

  1. Frank S Genovese Avatar
    Frank S Genovese

    You mentioned that bones and glass artifacts were found, but are they on display anyplace?
    Have any subterranean passageways been discovered ?

    Like

    1. Sorry, there was no mention of tunnels and no mention of where the artifacts from the site are being displayed in the source articles I looked at. Thanks for your comment

      Like

  2. Please get it right. Your citation from the NASV drops God’s name out of the frame. Tyndale played with two ideas: either his name as a name, or at least his name in capitals [LORD], to differentiate from adonai [Lord]. Dropping back to the Vulgate/Wycliffe rendition, you do but encourage Sabellianism, where Jesus, who is Lord (NT), can become the assumed OT referrent wherever God’s name is dropped below the radar.

    Like

  3. Sons of God is NOT a reference to Angels:
    The widely-held belief that “sons of God”, in reference to those who traverse our earth, refers to “Angels” is erroneous. Other references in scripture to “sons of God” who walk this earth refer specifically to those who are followers of the True God. 1 John 3:1-2, Romans 8:14, 19, John 1:12, Philippians 2:15.
    Whereas “Daughters of Men” is a clear reference to women who are worldly and do not follow the true God.
    The fallacy that God would allow Celestial Beings to mate with his mortal creations is absurd on the face.
    Our Father, God, is the only Celestial Being to Father a Child, born of a mortal woman. Anything more would be heresy.

    Like

    1. James McArthur Little Avatar
      James McArthur Little

      Jeff:

      As a Spirit awakened and justified believer, I am more than glad to say: you could not be more wrong when you deny that the “sons of God” were not angels. Those “sons of God” in Gen. 6 were fallen angels who cohabited with women. I’ve taught on this subject for decades, and recently. All God’s Children are taught of the Lord. I am glad I ran across your comments.

      Write me and give me your testimony. The greatest thing in all this world is to know Christ as my Lord and my Saviour.

      I would not exchange one scintilla of what I have in Christ for ten million worlds of gold and silver. Would you?

      I invite you to contact me through my e-mail: jimlittleent@gmail.com

      Bro. J.M. Little

      Like

  4. The book of Enoch disagrees with you those entities mentioned who mated with the daughter of mankind were called the watchers and they are not human by any means. Nor could the humans Yah created created Nephilim(Giants). It had to be another form of creature.

    Like

  5. Hi! Do you happen to have a source on the archaeological findings? I’m writing a report on the subject and a direct source would be super nice to have.
    Thank you!

    Like

  6. I agree with you Jeff Bates.

    Like

  7. You’re assuming the mountain in Revelation 8 is an asteroid. Given, that is the closest thing that I can think of that fits the bill, but scripture does not say that.

    Like

    1. Thanks for you comment.

      I think it is a reasonable presumption. He used the word star to describe what he saw because they had no word back then for asteroid. They do today but not back then. So he simply described what he saw – a fiery mountain sized object falling from the heavens.

      Along a similar vein I believe John also saw nuclear warheads in Revelation 8:10-11. Again when the most advanced weapon of his day was a bow and arrow how would he describe a ballistic missile. He described what he saw. He said it was torch like. Meaning it was long and narrow. It also had a fiery head, which is what happens when a ballistic missile renter the atmosphere. He said it was wormwood and when it hit the earth it transferred its wormwood to the earth making people sick. This is what happens when a nuclear weapons spreads radiation after it hits. Since they had no word for radiation or nuclear weapons in his vocabulary, John had to find other words to describe what he was seeing.

      Ironically wormwood was used both as a medicine and in larger doses as a poison. Which is similar to how radiation is used today.

      Just my opinion of course.

      Like

      1. I agree with everything you said. It is just wrong to state assumptions as truth. If you’re going to have a good, somewhat academic looking and sounding website, the proper way to do this is to say in my opinion, or in someone else’s opinion, (with a quote). Or at least make it obvious that you are not putting your own spin on things, because we never know for sure.

        Another place where you do this, for example, and I agree with you on what you say, but where you said gang rape, yes, this is the consensus of scripture scholars, but you don’t say that, you just say it as if the text says it.

        Anyway, just my two cents.

        Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Trending