Remember that old saying that those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it. While, that may define the World Health Organization (WHO). Earlier this year, WHO went to China to find out the origins of COVID and concluded this week that it probably did not originate in Communist China’s level 4 virus lab in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
A New York Times’ report alleges that the World Health Organization (WHO) actually made a deal with Chinese Communist Party (CCP), preventing WHO’s researchers from investigating COVID’s origins.
This was a bit of a shock, but it appears there is a bit of disagreement going on at the World Health Organization (WHO) about the benefits of lockdowns. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO’s boss, has come out strongly supportive of lockdowns (and Communist China), however, another member of WHO has just publicly condemned the lockdowns stating that all they are achieving is poverty. Breitbart explains: The UK’s envoy to the World Health Organisation (W.H.O.) has condemned mass coronavirus lockdowns, slamming the “ghastly global catastrophe” caused by crashing the world economy. Dr. David Nabarro from the W.H.O. appealed to world leaders on Saturday, telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus. He claimed that the only thing lockdowns achieved was poverty – with no mention of the potential lives saved. READ: Backflip: W.H.O. Condemns Coronavirus Lockdowns, Just ‘Doubling’ Global Poverty Of course, this is not the first time that I have reported on the growing disagreements among health care professions on the health benefits of lockdowns, that have turned political. Three …
Though questions remain about the severity of the coronavirus pandemic, it nevertheless exposed the unhealthy influence China’s Communist government seems to have on the World Health Organization (WHO).
Last week, two California doctors, Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi of Accelerated Urgent Care in Bakersfield, California, called for an end of the COVID-19 lock down because they believed the virus was no different from the flu in terms of the number of cases and deaths.
The Epoch Times recently produced a video linking the Coronavirus with a Communist run virology lab in Wuhan, China. Why did Facebook declare this video false? The Epoch Times responds.
This post is getting embarrassing, I am now retracting my retraction. I had originally posted that the emails for the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, the level-4 virology lab believed by many to be the source of the Coronavirus outbreak, the Gates Foundation and the World Health Organization (WHO), who some accuse of being a big defender of China’s communist leadership, had been hacked. Then I made a mistake of listening to someone who didn’t know what they were talking about and I debunked the story, and now it looks like there might be some truth to it. So I am retracting my retraction, sort of. Apparently other websites were hacked, that contained the login information for 25,000 people, some of whom worked at these organizations in question, plus many others. This login information was leaked on the dark web. Cyber security experts have verified that many of these leaked emails/passwords were real and many users had very weak passwords like “password,” “their name” or “12345”. One expert reported that 48 people at …